Ethnic Land Rights as a Faustian Bargain? On the Afro-Colombian Struggle for Alternative Livelihoods and Its Limits

Caroline Cornier

Progress in Development Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934261426727article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

From the 1990s onwards, ethnic minorities in Latin America have been granted collective property rights to protect their natural livelihoods and culture from extractivism and armed conflict. In the Colombian case, this legal innovation was largely the product of Afro-Colombian communities’ activism around cultural identities whose legal outcomes have been celebrated in post-development literature as evidence for subaltern groups regained self-determination and emancipation from unsustainable extractivist development models and violence. While other authors have since pointed to collective land rights’ essentializing tendencies and actual limitations in challenging extractive capitalism, including the Colombian drug economy, less attention has been given to what explains their limited outcomes in securing alternative livelihoods. Drawing on evidence from two Afro-Colombian communities, this article argues that ethnic land rights tend to disregard the communities’ own material entanglement with extractivist capitalism and that this complicates the search for effective ways of securing ethnic communities’ livelihoods.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934261426727

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{caroline2026,
  title        = {{Ethnic Land Rights as a Faustian Bargain? On the Afro-Colombian Struggle for Alternative Livelihoods and Its Limits}},
  author       = {Caroline Cornier},
  journal      = {Progress in Development Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934261426727},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ethnic Land Rights as a Faustian Bargain? On the Afro-Colombian Struggle for Alternative Livelihoods and Its Limits

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.