arbiter
JournalsAccount

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy: How Public Opinion Updates

James L. Gibson

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science2024https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251334522article
ABDC B
Weight
0.72

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling abrogating women’s long-established right to abortion affords an opportunity to better understand how people update their attitudes toward the court. The data analyzed here reinforce evidence from earlier studies that the Dobbs ruling produced a substantial hit to the court’s institutional legitimacy. Why and how did this occur? A dominant model of attitude change posits that short-term evaluations of the court’s performance are informed by individual rulings and readily evolve but that institutional loyalty originates from different sources and is resistant to change. Loyalty is not entirely impervious to change, however: This research suggests that controversial decisions can cause a realignment of both types of court attitudes and that this seems to have happened with Dobbs . But, as I show via an experiment, evaluations typically change first, and under some (but perhaps extraordinary) circumstances, changed evaluations can undermine institutional loyalty.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251334522

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{james2024,
  title        = {{The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy: How Public Opinion Updates}},
  author       = {James L. Gibson},
  journal      = {Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162251334522},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy: How Public Opinion Updates

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.72

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.