Associative updates for temporal contingencies

Niels J. Verosky

Journal of Mathematical Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2026.102971article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Associative learning of events’ co-occurrence rates across time can generate useful predictive representations (e.g., the successor representation), but temporal contiguities alone are not enough to infer causal relations. Recent work suggests that neural substrates long thought to implement temporal difference learning may perform causal inference by tracking temporal contingences — coincidences between events corrected by background co-occurrence rate. We show that changing the activation function enables simple associative updates to directly compute temporal contingencies. Temporal contiguities can be learned as the cross-correlation between a stimulus and a memory trace, and temporal contingencies can be learned as the cross-covariance. An implication is that neurally plausible causal learning algorithms can be implemented through simple associative updates. These results highlight a family of learning rules for incremental computation of forward, backward, and joint temporal contiguities and contingencies. • Causal inference across time requires tracking temporal contingencies, not just temporal contiguities. • It is possible to learn temporal contingencies through simple associative updates. • Temporal contingencies can be learned as the cross-covariance between a stimulus and a memory trace. • Neurally plausible causal learning algorithms could be implemented through simple associative updates.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2026.102971

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{niels2026,
  title        = {{Associative updates for temporal contingencies}},
  author       = {Niels J. Verosky},
  journal      = {Journal of Mathematical Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2026.102971},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Associative updates for temporal contingencies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.