Vector-valued games: characterization of equilibria in matrix games

Giovanni P. Crespi et al.

Mathematical Methods of Operations Research2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-025-00892-5article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

In this paper, we provide a systematization of the equilibrium concepts for vector-valued games. In general abstract setting, we give the definitions of Nash equilibrium, weak Nash equilibrium, and proper Nash equilibrium, we investigate the relationships among them, and we provide existence results for proper Nash equilibria and weak Nash equilibria. The link between the introduced equilibrium concepts and Nash equilibria of a game with scalar payoffs obtained by means of linear scalarization is investigated. For a vector matrix game, we show that the notions of proper Nash equilibrium and Nash equilibrium are equivalent, we prove existence of both Nash equilibria and weak Nash equilibria, we give characterizations of proper and weak best correspondence sets respectively, by defining characterizing functions from the matrices and the preference cones, and finally we list all best correspondence sets. The given definitions are illustrated by means of examples.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-025-00892-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giovanni2025,
  title        = {{Vector-valued games: characterization of equilibria in matrix games}},
  author       = {Giovanni P. Crespi et al.},
  journal      = {Mathematical Methods of Operations Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-025-00892-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Vector-valued games: characterization of equilibria in matrix games

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.