Radical pedagogies for territorial contestations

Francisco Vergara‐Perucich et al.

Community Development Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaf023article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This editorial introduces a Special Section that repositions radical pedagogy at the centre of contemporary territorial contestations. It argues that the current polycrisis—climate, political, and economical—acts as a potent social catalyst, intensifying inequalities and transforming territories into arenas of struggle where fundamental rights are at stake. We contend that in this context, pedagogy is not a secondary concern but a primary site of political praxis. The editorial develops a conceptual framework for radical pedagogy that, whilst rooted in Freirean critical consciousness, is necessarily extended through decolonial, intersectional, and feminist theories. This framework emphasizes an education that is embodied, place-based, and attentive to the affective dimensions of learning. The contributions gathered here offer grounded case studies that demonstrate how these pedagogies function in practice, forging tools for resistance, solidarity, and self-representation. Ultimately, this editorial reflects on the inherent tensions of this work—navigating the lines between conflict and care, and between education and activism—to advocate for a critical pedagogical praxis capable of building more just, collaborative and resilient futures from the ground up.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaf023

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{francisco2025,
  title        = {{Radical pedagogies for territorial contestations}},
  author       = {Francisco Vergara‐Perucich et al.},
  journal      = {Community Development Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsaf023},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Radical pedagogies for territorial contestations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.