A fragile relationship: Turkey and the European Union moving beyond membership with external differentiated integration

Meltem Müftüler‐Baç

West European Politics2025https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2024.2442870article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.52

What the paper says

Turkey’s relations with the European Union depend on extensive legal instruments, drivers of interdependence and voluntary compliance to the EU rules. With an Association Agreement dating back to 1963 and accession negotiations opened in 2005, there is a high degree of asymmetric interdependence between Turkey and the EU. This article examines Turkish-EU relations from the angle of external differentiated integration (EDI). Accordingly, this article assesses the feasibility of the current state of Turkey’s fragile relations with the EU as a functional model of external differentiated integration. Turkish EDI provides an innovative framework for keeping Turkey anchored to the European order, for which neither full membership nor a complete break up seems plausible. To assess shades of non-membership for Turkey, the article relies on an extensive keyword-based assessment of EU-Lex documents, trade statistics and a co-occurrence network analysis for the EU’s 2012 and 2022 Progress Reports on Turkey. The findings shed light on the complexities of the EU’s EDI with non-members.

7 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2024.2442870

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{meltem2025,
  title        = {{A fragile relationship: Turkey and the European Union moving beyond membership with external differentiated integration}},
  author       = {Meltem Müftüler‐Baç},
  journal      = {West European Politics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2024.2442870},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A fragile relationship: Turkey and the European Union moving beyond membership with external differentiated integration

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.52

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.47 × 0.4 = 0.19
M · momentum0.68 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.