How SMEs explore international opportunities by learning from failure: The effects of entrepreneurial risk-taking and normative institutions

Jing A. Zhang et al.

International Journal of Innovation Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2026.01.003article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study examines how learning from failure shapes international opportunity (IO) exploration among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in emerging markets. Drawing on dynamic capability and organizational learning perspectives, we theorize that learning from failure fosters IO exploration through entrepreneurial risk-taking. Furthermore, we argue that the strength of this indirect relationship depends on the normative institutional environment in the SME’s home country. Using both symmetrical (PLS-SEM) and asymmetrical (fsQCA) methods, we analyse data from 146 Chinese SMEs. The results support our framework: entrepreneurial risk-taking is a key mechanism through which learning from failure is linked to IO exploration. Notably, we find that the stronger the home country normative institutions, the weaker the indirect effect. In addition, our configurational analysis reveals multiple pathways in which learning from failure, risk-taking, and institutional context combine to generate either high or low levels of IO exploration.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2026.01.003

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jing2026,
  title        = {{How SMEs explore international opportunities by learning from failure: The effects of entrepreneurial risk-taking and normative institutions}},
  author       = {Jing A. Zhang et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Innovation Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2026.01.003},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How SMEs explore international opportunities by learning from failure: The effects of entrepreneurial risk-taking and normative institutions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.