arbiter
JournalsAccount

Corrigendum: Strategic leadership and inter-firm knowledge sharing: foundations for effective digital transformation and customer engagement

Unknown author

International Marketing Review2026https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2025-0666article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article, Usman M, Zahoor N, Akhtar MW, Bani-Melhem S (2025), “Strategic leadership and inter-firm knowledge sharing: foundations for effective digital transformation and customer engagement”. International Marketing Review, Vol. 42 No. 6 pp. 1382-1397, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2024-0434 missed to update the second affiliation for the second author Zahoor Nadia during proof stage. The affiliation should read as “School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK and Innolab, University of Vaasa, Finland”.This has now been corrected in the online version. The publisher asks that affiliation be entered correctly at submission and confirmed at article proofing stage.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2025-0666

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: Strategic leadership and inter-firm knowledge sharing: foundations for effective digital transformation and customer engagement}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {International Marketing Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-12-2025-0666},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: Strategic leadership and inter-firm knowledge sharing: foundations for effective digital transformation and customer engagement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.