arbiter
JournalsAccount

Bringing institutions back in: Neo-institutionalism and impact evaluation

Anne Revillard & Héloïse Lucas

Evaluation2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261425961article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

While impact evaluation has moved away from strictly behavioural approaches (as embodied by randomised controlled trials) to include contexts and mechanisms, the role of institutions as explanatory mechanisms has so far been understudied. This lack of reflection on institutions in impact evaluation contrasts with the centrality of neo-institutionalism in policy analysis. This article draws on the inputs of these theoretical reflections developed in policy analysis to theorise how institutions can be analysed as an explanatory mechanism in impact evaluation. The fruitfulness of this perspective is empirically illustrated by the case of an impact evaluation of French community centres. The article shows how community centres as institutions mediate the impact of a variety of community-based interventions through fostering a welcoming culture, encouraging the expression of residents’ needs and wishes, and relying on organisational flexibility and embeddedness.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261425961

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anne2026,
  title        = {{Bringing institutions back in: Neo-institutionalism and impact evaluation}},
  author       = {Anne Revillard & Héloïse Lucas},
  journal      = {Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261425961},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bringing institutions back in: Neo-institutionalism and impact evaluation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.