Transformational Agroecology: The Making and Unmaking of Zero Budget Natural Farming in India

Poonam Pandey & Lídia Cabral

Science, Technology and Society2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326835article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Agroecology is increasingly seen to have the potential to transform agriculture towards sustainability and social justice. Recent studies have highlighted different characteristics and principles of such transformative agroecology. Scholars have also shown that agroecology practices can be scaled up to achieve broader transformation. However, the process of systematising approaches to transformative agroecology often creates a static vision of transformation, which could be achieved once and for all. The static view creates illusionary binaries of goods and bads of agroecology that separate the ideological scholarly view from everyday, contested and messy practices. In this article, we discuss the case of Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) in India to argue that transformational agroecology is made and unmade repeatedly at different sites, networks and practices it gets entangled in. As a result, rather than thinking of transformative agroecology as a goal or target to be achieved, it is more useful to see it as an everyday struggle requiring unwavering scrutiny with a commitment to care for the marginal concerns.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326835

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{poonam2025,
  title        = {{Transformational Agroecology: The Making and Unmaking of Zero Budget Natural Farming in India}},
  author       = {Poonam Pandey & Lídia Cabral},
  journal      = {Science, Technology and Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218251326835},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Transformational Agroecology: The Making and Unmaking of Zero Budget Natural Farming in India

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.