Pricing and greening strategies in a dual-channel supply chain with government tariffs and cannibalisation under demand uncertainty

Amit Ranjan et al.

European Journal of Industrial Engineering2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2025.144706article
AJG 2
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

In light of the drastic exhaustion of natural resources and increased environmental pollution, to promote the use of green products, the government subsidises them and levies taxes on non-green ones. This paper considers a dual-channel supply chain with a manufacturer selling a green product online and a substitutable non-green product offline using a retail channel. The price differential splits the market into two segments. The stochastic linear demand is modelled as a function of prices, green quality level, and sales effort level, considering government tariffs and demand leakage. A centralised decision model is investigated for the case of uniform distribution and distribution-free demand. It is shown that the green quality level and the total supply chain profit increase with an increase in demand leakage. Also, it reveals that with an increment in government subsidy and tax, the total supply chain profit and green quality level are higher in uniform distribution. [Received: 20 April 2023; Accepted: 9 October 2023]

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2025.144706

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{amit2025,
  title        = {{Pricing and greening strategies in a dual-channel supply chain with government tariffs and cannibalisation under demand uncertainty}},
  author       = {Amit Ranjan et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Industrial Engineering},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2025.144706},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pricing and greening strategies in a dual-channel supply chain with government tariffs and cannibalisation under demand uncertainty

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.