arbiter
JournalsAccount

Students’ perceptions of different assessment modes and student experience

Phil Hancock et al.

Journal of Accounting Education2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100953article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

• Use of different assessment modes in COVID-19. • Some students found doing online assessments at home less stressful. • Other students felt they were less likely to perform well when compared to assessments on campus. • Challenges include students experienced stress due to failing technologies. • Some students experienced feelings of isolation; and perceived that questions might be harder to prevent cheating. This study investigates student experiences and perceptions of online and face-to-face assessments. Focus groups were conducted with students at three Australian universities to understand their experiences of online examinations. Student perceptions and experiences of online examinations were mixed. Benefits include better reflecting workplaces and being able to complete the examination at a time that suited them. Whilst many students found taking online assessments at home less stressful, others felt they were less likely to perform well when compared to assessments on campus. Students also identified several challenges with online assessments. Students experienced stress due to failing technologies; needed additional time required to ‘write’ examinations; experienced feelings of isolation; and perceived that questions might be harder to prevent cheating.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100953

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{phil2025,
  title        = {{Students’ perceptions of different assessment modes and student experience}},
  author       = {Phil Hancock et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Accounting Education},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100953},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Students’ perceptions of different assessment modes and student experience

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.