arbiter
JournalsAccount

Climate Change and Field-Level Crop Quality, Yield, and Revenue

Sarah Smith & Timothy K.M. Beatty

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists2025https://doi.org/10.1086/736749article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.44

Abstract

We quantify the effect of weather and climate on the revenue of processing-tomato farmers through yield and quality—quality being an understudied channel despite its role in price determination. Screening out low-quality products introduces selection bias into estimates of the effect of weather and climate on agriculture. Our novel data allow us to estimate this bias. We find that extreme temperatures reduce both yield and quality, leading to reduced revenue. While the yield effect dominates, failing to account for quality leads to a significant underestimate of the effect of temperature exposure on revenue. We predict climate change will significantly reduce yield and quality by century’s end absent adaptation and all else equal. Yield effects are overstated while quality effects are understated when estimation relies on data on a subset of output that exceeds a quality threshold. Empirical work that ignores selection on quality may misrepresent the climate change challenge.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/736749

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sarah2025,
  title        = {{Climate Change and Field-Level Crop Quality, Yield, and Revenue}},
  author       = {Sarah Smith & Timothy K.M. Beatty},
  journal      = {Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/736749},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Climate Change and Field-Level Crop Quality, Yield, and Revenue

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.