Women in Mining, Industry Norms, and Rural Patriarchy: A Perfect Storm

Donna Bridges et al.

Gender, Work and Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70135article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Rural industries are historically male‐dominated with women commonly out‐migrating to metropolitan areas in search of work opportunities. Rural industries, such as mining, have the potential to recruit women from rural areas, offering employment, training, and income prospects and to contribute positively to rural women's economic and employment success. However, this potential is unrealized because of unsafe and sexist workplaces. This paper reports the findings of a survey completed by women working in trade occupations in the Australian mining industry. Findings indicate that the combination of pervasive patriarchal, masculine norms in rural areas, a sexist mining industry, and ubiquitous challenges in male‐dominated workplaces combine to create a “perfect storm” of barriers for women in mining trades. We conclude that a more coordinated approach from governments and the mining industry in implementing and managing gender equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives is required to support women in the industry.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70135

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{donna2026,
  title        = {{Women in Mining, Industry Norms, and Rural Patriarchy: A Perfect Storm}},
  author       = {Donna Bridges et al.},
  journal      = {Gender, Work and Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70135},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Women in Mining, Industry Norms, and Rural Patriarchy: A Perfect Storm

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.