The Perils of Partial Reform: Capability Systems and Public Organization Performance

Sérgio Nogueira Seabra & Andrew M. Pettigrew

Public Organization Review2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00977-zarticle
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Why do public sector reforms often fail or backfire? Using survey data from 127 English hospital trusts, we demonstrate that organizational capabilities function as interdependent systems where partial development harms performance. While organizations combining functional, adaptive, and positional capabilities show significant performance gains, those developing strong internal capabilities without external stakeholder support perform worse than those making no changes. This “premature optimization trap” occurs when internal improvements lack support and legitimacy, wasting resources and generating cynicism. These findings challenge best-practice approaches and contribute to explain reform failures. Effective public sector improvement requires orchestrating complementary capabilities, not implementing isolated interventions.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00977-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sérgio2026,
  title        = {{The Perils of Partial Reform: Capability Systems and Public Organization Performance}},
  author       = {Sérgio Nogueira Seabra & Andrew M. Pettigrew},
  journal      = {Public Organization Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00977-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Perils of Partial Reform: Capability Systems and Public Organization Performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.