Policy Forum: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies—Where Does Canada Stand?

Nicolas Epelbaum et al.

Canadian Tax Journal2026https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2026.74.1.pf.epelbaumarticle
ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Governments worldwide have struggled with determining what role taxes or tax penalties should play in promoting public health by reducing sugar consumption. In Canada, the only tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) was introduced by Newfoundland and Labrador in 2022, although it was eliminated in 2025 owing to public concerns about affordability. This article reviews four categories of policies that have been suggested to aid in reducing SSB consumption: financial, information, defaults, and availability. The authors find that, in Canada, policies have been enacted with respect to total sugar product labelling and school food policies, but further policy initiatives should be coordinated at the national level to reduce the consumption of SSBs.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2026.74.1.pf.epelbaum

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nicolas2026,
  title        = {{Policy Forum: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies—Where Does Canada Stand?}},
  author       = {Nicolas Epelbaum et al.},
  journal      = {Canadian Tax Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2026.74.1.pf.epelbaum},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Policy Forum: Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Reduction Policies—Where Does Canada Stand?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.