Growth Erosion in MENAP during 2000–2018: Reasons and Remedies

Alexei Kireyev

Review of Middle East Economics and Finance2025https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2020-0010article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract The paper examines the reasons for growth erosion in the Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (MENAP) region in the period preceding the Covid-19 crisis. Over the past two decades before the crisis the regions’ growth has been lower relative to its peers, despite facing similar circumstances as those countries, such as low oil prices and weak external demand. The paper argues that key reasons for growth erosion in MENAP have been domestic, primarily negative total factor productivity, weak preparedness for shocks, insufficient fiscal buffers, unsystematic fiscal adjustment with arbitrary cuts in investment, and low investment efficiency. External factors—the decline in oil and other commodity prices, weak external demand, and geopolitical tensions—have also been important, but mainly for oil exporters. Key policy options to reinvigorate growth include leveraging technology and trade to improve productivity, developing a macroeconomic risk management system, implementing growth-friendly fiscal adjustment, improving growth inclusiveness, and fostering the private sector.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2020-0010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexei2025,
  title        = {{Growth Erosion in MENAP during 2000–2018: Reasons and Remedies}},
  author       = {Alexei Kireyev},
  journal      = {Review of Middle East Economics and Finance},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/rmeef-2020-0010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Growth Erosion in MENAP during 2000–2018: Reasons and Remedies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.