arbiter
JournalsAccount

Using intersectional implicit association measures does not consistently improve the predictive validity of the implicit association test

Jeffrey To & Jordan Axt

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104919article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

No abstract available.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104919

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jeffrey2026,
  title        = {{Using intersectional implicit association measures does not consistently improve the predictive validity of the implicit association test}},
  author       = {Jeffrey To & Jordan Axt},
  journal      = {Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104919},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Using intersectional implicit association measures does not consistently improve the predictive validity of the implicit association test

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.