Time-inconsistent Output Subsidy/Tax Policies in Free-entry Mixed Markets

Jiaqi Chen et al.

Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics2019https://doi.org/10.15057/30362article
ABDC B
Weight
0.52

Abstract

This study considers time-inconsistent output subsidy/tax policies in free-entry mixed markets under different competition modes. In a committed regime where the subsidy is determined before entry, the optimal rate is zero in either Cournot or Stackelberg game with private leadership, while it is negative in Stackelberg game with public leadership. In a non-committed regime where the subsidy is determined after entry, the optimal rate is always positive. We also show that private leadership is the best for social welfare regardless of the timing of subsidy policies, but public leadership might be equilibrium if the timing of entry decisions is endogenous.

8 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/30362

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jiaqi2019,
  title        = {{Time-inconsistent Output Subsidy/Tax Policies in Free-entry Mixed Markets}},
  author       = {Jiaqi Chen et al.},
  journal      = {Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2019},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15057/30362},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Time-inconsistent Output Subsidy/Tax Policies in Free-entry Mixed Markets

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.52

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.43 × 0.4 = 0.17
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.