Quotas Unhinged? How the Change to Preferential Voting Impacts Women’s Representation in Two German Länder

Petra Ahrens & Sabine Lang

Political Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251410745article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Proportional electoral systems, especially when coupled with voluntary party or legislative gender quotas, have been considered beneficial for advancing women’s representation. Extant research on preferential voting in proportional systems, however, yields conflicting evidence. We focus on recent electoral reforms in two German Länder, Hamburg and Bremen, that converted their proportional system from closed to open party lists with preferential voting. Through calculating a counterfactual, we assess the gendered outcomes differentiated between elections, parliaments and parties, to show that party culture plays a pivotal role in shaping the effects of voluntary party quotas within the context of electoral system changes. Our findings underscore the nuanced interaction between electoral system reform and a party’s commitment to gender parity, highlighting the significance of pre-reform party positions and their dedication to prioritizing gender quotas.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251410745

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{petra2026,
  title        = {{Quotas Unhinged? How the Change to Preferential Voting Impacts Women’s Representation in Two German Länder}},
  author       = {Petra Ahrens & Sabine Lang},
  journal      = {Political Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251410745},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Quotas Unhinged? How the Change to Preferential Voting Impacts Women’s Representation in Two German Länder

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.