arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Outcomes of Enterprise Resource Planning System on Organizational Productivity

Tambei Chiawah et al.

International Journal of Applied Management and Technology2022https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2022.21.1.02article
ABDC C
Weight
0.46

What the paper says

Leaders within local government organizations do not understand how to achieve expected and desired benefits from the implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The lack of alignment between social and technical elements in ERP implementation continues to depress organizational productivity. The prime objective of our quantitative correlational study was to examine whether social and technical elements increase use and productivity in ERP implementation. Sociotechnical systems theory provided the theoretical basis for our study. We examined six dimensional variables relating to ERP implementation. Our key findings indicated positive significant relationships between ERP and information sharing, between ERP system quality and ease of ERP use, and between ERP system quality and organizational productivity. Further studies could examine other dimensions that could ensure ERP sustainability in other government organizations.

6 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2022.21.1.02

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tambei2022,
  title        = {{Outcomes of Enterprise Resource Planning System on Organizational Productivity}},
  author       = {Tambei Chiawah et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Applied Management and Technology},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/ijamt.2022.21.1.02},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Outcomes of Enterprise Resource Planning System on Organizational Productivity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.30 × 0.4 = 0.12
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.