Trump digs votes: the role of Trump’s coal campaign in the 2016 presidential election

Philipp Steinbrunner et al.

The Annals of Regional Science: international journal of urban, regional and environmental research and policy2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01447-6article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the relationship between Donald Trump’s coal-focused campaign during his race for the White House and the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. First, we document an increase in the Republican Party’s vote share in coal counties from 2016 onwards, relative to previous presidential elections. Subsequently, we employ a spatial Durbin Error model to estimate the relationship between coal production and the Republican vote share at the county level in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. To avoid biased estimates, we account for spillover effects and apply spatial clustering. Our results reveal a sudden increase in the Republican vote share in coal counties in 2016, associated with the campaign pledge. When considering both the size of coal production, which varies across coal counties, and spillover effects, we again find a significant positive relationship. This effect becomes even more pronounced when using the vote-share difference between Mitt Romney in 2012 and Donald Trump in 2016 as the dependent variable. The positive relationship between coal production and Republican vote share remains robust after accounting for nonlinearities and when coal production per worker and per hour worked are employed as the main explanatory variables.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01447-6

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{philipp2026,
  title        = {{Trump digs votes: the role of Trump’s coal campaign in the 2016 presidential election}},
  author       = {Philipp Steinbrunner et al.},
  journal      = {The Annals of Regional Science: international journal of urban, regional and environmental research and policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-025-01447-6},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Trump digs votes: the role of Trump’s coal campaign in the 2016 presidential election

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.