Regulating the Visible Hands: Development of Rules on State-Owned Enterprises in Trade Agreements

Minwoo Kim

Harvard International Law Journal2017article
ABDC A
Weight
0.48

Abstract

The rise of modern state capitalism has cast doubt on the current global economic system and its assumption of a clear division between state and market. At the core of this systemic challenge are the state-owned enterprises of the 21st century. Unlike their predecessors, the state-owned enterprises of today have been transformed into powerful tools for global competition, shrouded under corporate veils. With the existing legal framework both unyielding and unprepared to accommodate these new developments, the momentum for reform soon reached its zenith. The Trans-Pacific Partnership’s chapter on state-owned enterprises, the first stand-alone chapter on the subject, should be analyzed in this context. It consolidates and updates preexisting rules by introducing a bright-line definition of what state-owned enterprises are and incorporates tools to enhance the enforceability of the rule. Despite the significant accomplishments of the new rule and the rationale for the changes, the rule suffers from several shortcomings. This Note provides a legal analysis and critical evaluation of the rule, focusing on how it departs from the preexisting rule and highlights the factors that undermine its effectiveness. To breathe life into this theoretical analysis and evaluation, the Note also provides a case study of how the rule will affect a potential new entrant, South Korea.

11 citations

Cite this paper

@article{minwoo2017,
  title        = {{Regulating the Visible Hands: Development of Rules on State-Owned Enterprises in Trade Agreements}},
  author       = {Minwoo Kim},
  journal      = {Harvard International Law Journal},
  year         = {2017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Regulating the Visible Hands: Development of Rules on State-Owned Enterprises in Trade Agreements

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.35 × 0.4 = 0.14
M · momentum0.75 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.