Towards Building of First-class Scientific Research Group: A Case Study of Four Groups (in China)
Sihan Hou et al.
What the paper says
The scientific research group is an important capability base to propel a country like China to the forefront of innovative countries. Given its importance, increasing the number of scientific research groups in China is an important strategy for enhancing the country’s scientific research capacity and promoting scientific development in the world. Our study employs grounded theory and in-depth interviews to explore the construction of scientific capabilities of Chinese scientific research groups. We adopt the actor-activity-position-linkage (AAPL) model of innovation ecosystems to explore the contributing factors to the innovation output of research groups. From an actor’s perspective, research group members’ scientific competence, technological compartmentalises, and personal characteristics are important influences on scientific research capacity. Meanwhile, the academic competence of the team leader is the most central element of the team’s innovation capability. The internal structure of first-class scientific research group (FSRG) members, the management system, and the FSRG climate have a significant impact on innovation within the FSRG organisation. This study challenges the structural view of innovative talent, responds to the debate about the impact of administrative positions on scientific research, and provides insights into how to develop a tradition of innovation and maintain continuous innovation.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.