arbiter
JournalsAccount

Public financing under balanced budget rules

Minjie Deng & Chang Liu

Review of Economic Dynamics2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2025.101275article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.44

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of a balanced budget rule (BBR) on government financing costs and its implications for the government balance sheet. Exploiting the variation in BBR implementation across US states, we find that states with more stringent BBRs exhibit significantly lower bond spreads and credit default swap spreads, demonstrating the crucial role of default risk. A sovereign default model, which features long-term debt, endogenous investment and output, as well as a BBR, aligns with the empirical result. Calibrated to Illinois, our quantitative analysis suggests that implementing a BBR could dramatically decrease the state bond spread, gradually lower the debt, and improve welfare in the long run. • US states with more stringent BBRs have significantly lower state bond spreads. • BBRs are also associated with lower default risks. • A default model captures the interplay of BBR, debt, investment, and default risk. • BBRs improve government balance sheet and welfare in the long run.

3 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2025.101275

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{minjie2025,
  title        = {{Public financing under balanced budget rules}},
  author       = {Minjie Deng & Chang Liu},
  journal      = {Review of Economic Dynamics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2025.101275},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Public financing under balanced budget rules

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.