Evaluation of maintenance strategies using Pythagorean fuzzy sets: a novel model for time-constrained processes

Semih Can Sancar et al.

Journal of Business Analytics2025https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234x.2025.2467097article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Considering the large investment cost as well as expectations such as increased awareness ofoccupational safety and quality, choosing the appropriate maintenance strategy emerges as acritical decision. Time-constrained production processes, which demand defect-free produc-tion within a limited timeframe, intensify the significance of this selection problem. In suchproduction processes, the product is generally short-lived, so stocking is not possible.Therefore, halting operations incurs significant costs. In this study, we aim to choose themost appropriate maintenance planning strategy for time-constrained processes. Given thatthe process of selecting a maintenance strategy is ambiguous and lacks conclusive assess-ments, it involves numerous hazy criteria. Thus, this study presents a framework that includesthe Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-CRITIC-Entropy combined weighting method hybridized withPythagorean Fuzzy WASPAS. The model evaluates the maintenance options of Türkiye’s largestprinting company, which operates under time-constrained processes, in a real-world case studyproving the merit of the proposed methodology.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234x.2025.2467097

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{semih2025,
  title        = {{Evaluation of maintenance strategies using Pythagorean fuzzy sets: a novel model for time-constrained processes}},
  author       = {Semih Can Sancar et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Business Analytics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234x.2025.2467097},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Evaluation of maintenance strategies using Pythagorean fuzzy sets: a novel model for time-constrained processes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.