Are men less generous to a smarter woman? Evidence from a dictator game experiment

Yuki Takahashi

Journal of Economic Science Association2025https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.9article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Although evidence suggests men are more generous to women than to men, it may stem from paternalism and could reverse when women excel in important skills for one’s career success, such as cognitive skills. Using a dictator game, this paper studies whether male dictators allocate less to female receivers than to male receivers when these receivers have higher intelligence quotients (IQs) than dictators. By exogenously varying the receivers’ IQ relative to the dictators’, I do not find evidence consistent with this hypothesis; if anything, male dictators allocate slightly more to female receivers with higher IQs than to male receivers with equivalent IQs. The results hold both in mean and distribution and are robust to the so-called “beauty premium.” Also, female dictators’ allocations are qualitatively similar to male dictators. These findings suggest that women who excel in cognitive skills may not receive less favorable treatment than equally intelligent men in the labor market.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.9

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yuki2025,
  title        = {{Are men less generous to a smarter woman? Evidence from a dictator game experiment}},
  author       = {Yuki Takahashi},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic Science Association},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/esa.2025.9},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Are men less generous to a smarter woman? Evidence from a dictator game experiment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.