Spotting the Predictive Dynamics of Cyclically‐Adjusted Financial Ratios in the US Stock Market

Catherine Georgiou & Athanasios Fassas

Economic Notes2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.70018article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Predicting returns is a timeless and important economic topic. Fundamental analysts see identifying time‐varying predictive factors as a key goal in asset pricing. This paper provides strong evidence of time‐varying return predictability of the S&P 500 Index from 1929 to 2020, by proposing the construction of altered versions of the classical dividend‐price (dp) and earnings‐price (ep). Our study's primary objectives are to introduce a cyclical adjustment to the simple dp and ep, which would smooth dividends and earnings, to compare the predictive dynamics of these new ratios with their simple counterparts and to modify all ratios based on long‐run equilibrium relationships that arise between the examined variables. We provide solid evidence that the cyclically‐adjusted ratios perform better than the simple predictors in all forecasting horizons, both in and out of sample, and the modified variables capture more predictive components in returns. Through certain robustness checks including multivariate regression settings and evidence on excess and real return predictability, we thoroughly present the predictive components identified in our data set.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.70018

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{catherine2026,
  title        = {{Spotting the Predictive Dynamics of Cyclically‐Adjusted Financial Ratios in the US Stock Market}},
  author       = {Catherine Georgiou & Athanasios Fassas},
  journal      = {Economic Notes},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.70018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Spotting the Predictive Dynamics of Cyclically‐Adjusted Financial Ratios in the US Stock Market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.