arbiter
JournalsAccount

Enhancing Intercultural Understanding Through Collaborative Online International Learning: An Analysis of Benefits, Challenges and Insights

Julie Waddington et al.

Active Learning in Higher Education2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874261430908article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) in developing intercultural understanding among university students. A 2-year COIL project, ‘Linguistic and Cultural Diversity Across Contexts’, was implemented between universities in Catalonia (Spain) and Poland, involving 49 students from Special Education and Inclusive Education programmes. Using a humanising methodology, this qualitative study collected data through initial interviews, narrative reflections and focus groups. Findings highlight the benefits of COIL, including enhanced intercultural awareness, positive impact on learners’ self-perceived communication competence and empathy. However, challenges such as language anxiety, task design limitations and resistance to new methodologies among students were also identified. The study contributes to the research on COIL with a focus on students’ perspectives, underscoring the potential of COIL to foster intercultural understanding and inclusivity in higher education.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874261430908

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{julie2026,
  title        = {{Enhancing Intercultural Understanding Through Collaborative Online International Learning: An Analysis of Benefits, Challenges and Insights}},
  author       = {Julie Waddington et al.},
  journal      = {Active Learning in Higher Education},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874261430908},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Enhancing Intercultural Understanding Through Collaborative Online International Learning: An Analysis of Benefits, Challenges and Insights

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.