How Should a Global Brand Manager Respond to an Ambiguous Product Harm Crisis?

Daniel Laufer

Advances in International Marketing2012https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-7979(2012)0000023008book-chapter
ABDC C
Weight
0.54

What the paper says

Product harm crises are becoming increasingly common, and recent examples include Toyota and Vioxx. This chapter examines country differences that impact consumer blame attributions for an ambiguous product harm crisis, and proposes a framework for a crisis response strategy. The first step involves assessing the level of uncertainty avoidance and crisis severity which serve as an indicator of the urgency felt by consumers to assess blame. The second step involves examining consumer beliefs and information processing biases to determine who consumers will most likely blame in order to resolve the uncertainty. Based on information gathered from these steps, a crisis response strategy is suggested for global brand managers.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-7979(2012)0000023008

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{daniel2012,
  title        = {{How Should a Global Brand Manager Respond to an Ambiguous Product Harm Crisis?}},
  author       = {Daniel Laufer},
  journal      = {Advances in International Marketing},
  year         = {2012},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-7979(2012)0000023008},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

How Should a Global Brand Manager Respond to an Ambiguous Product Harm Crisis?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.53 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.68 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.