Wealth, prevention, and longevity: Integrating health into portfolio decisions

Giovanna Apicella et al.

Journal of Evolutionary Economics2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-026-00948-7article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper presents a novel framework for integrating preventive health expenditures into a lifetime portfolio selection model under uncertain lifetimes. Building on financial portfolio optimization and actuarial mortality modeling, we examine how health investments influence individual longevity and financial decisions. In our model, age at death is treated as a random variable, and individuals allocate a fraction of their wealth to prevention in order to reduce mortality risk and extend life expectancy. This endogenous link between health spending and survival allows us to explore the dynamic interplay between wealth accumulation, longevity, and health-related behavior over the life cycle. Through numerical simulations, we illustrate how optimal prevention strategies vary systematically by gender, age, and country-specific mortality profiles. The results highlight how personal characteristics and demographic factors shape the trade-offs between consumption, investment, and health. Our findings offer valuable insights for both individual financial planning and the design of public health policies in an era of increasing longevity and growing economic-health interdependence.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-026-00948-7

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giovanna2026,
  title        = {{Wealth, prevention, and longevity: Integrating health into portfolio decisions}},
  author       = {Giovanna Apicella et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Evolutionary Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-026-00948-7},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Wealth, prevention, and longevity: Integrating health into portfolio decisions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.