Conflict and Coordination Mechanisms in Family Travel

Shuo Yu et al.

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480261420317article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The existing literature reveals a lack of research on conflict and coordination mechanisms in family travel. This study extends generational theory by qualitatively examining real travel experiences among three-generation Chinese families. The findings identify conflicts arising from differences in perspectives, decision-making, preferences, and health concerns. These conflicts are managed through five coordination mechanisms: compartmentalized coordination, rotational responsibility, strategic compromise, consensus building, and authoritative decision-making. By applying intergenerational theory and social exchange theory, this research deepens the understanding of how Chinese families navigate intergenerational dynamics during travel. It contributes to the literature by highlighting culturally embedded coordination patterns that maintain harmony and ensure collective satisfaction in family travel contexts. It also offers practical implications for developing targeted marketing strategies for family-oriented tourism products.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480261420317

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shuo2026,
  title        = {{Conflict and Coordination Mechanisms in Family Travel}},
  author       = {Shuo Yu et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480261420317},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Conflict and Coordination Mechanisms in Family Travel

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.