Mitigating the Experience of Everyday Boredom: The Role of Conscientiousness

Jun S. Liu et al.

International Journal of Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70201article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examined the relation between HEXACO personality traits and the experience of everyday boredom. Grounded in the theoretical frameworks concerning both boredom and personality, we particularly focused on the link and underlying mechanisms of conscientiousness and state boredom. Three studies-two daily diary studies and one experience sampling study-were conducted. Across the three studies, with 401 Chinese participants answering around 5900 daily episodes, the results consistently demonstrated that trait conscientiousness was a negative predictor of everyday boredom. State conscientiousness explained the conscientiousness-boredom relation. More importantly, situational meaning moderated the conscientiousness-boredom relation in the way that conscientious people were less likely to feel bored even in situations that were less meaningful to them. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70201

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jun2026,
  title        = {{Mitigating the Experience of Everyday Boredom: The Role of Conscientiousness}},
  author       = {Jun S. Liu et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70201},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mitigating the Experience of Everyday Boredom: The Role of Conscientiousness

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.