Between ambition and constraint: Crises and contestations in Southern Rhodesia's civil aviation, 1910s–1953

Munyaradzi Gift Mabhande & Eric Kushinga Makombe

Journal of Transport History2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266261428688article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This article examines the development of civil aviation in Southern Rhodesia from the 1910s to 1953, arguing that aviation emerged through institutional instability, financial constraint, and contested governance rather than through steady technological advance. It shows how shifting relationships between the colonial state, private operators, and imperial authorities produced a transport system characterised by subsidised monopolies, wartime requisitioning, and uneven postwar reconstruction. Drawing on extensive archival research in the National Archives of Zimbabwe, including government correspondence, policy reports, legislation, and cabinet minutes, and supplemented by contemporary newspapers, the article traces how aviation remained marginal within the colony's transport economy despite its symbolic and strategic importance. The findings highlight the limits of colonial transport ambitions and demonstrate how aviation policy was shaped less by commercial efficiency than by administrative capacity, fiscal restraint, and imperial priorities.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266261428688

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{munyaradzi2026,
  title        = {{Between ambition and constraint: Crises and contestations in Southern Rhodesia's civil aviation, 1910s–1953}},
  author       = {Munyaradzi Gift Mabhande & Eric Kushinga Makombe},
  journal      = {Journal of Transport History},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266261428688},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Between ambition and constraint: Crises and contestations in Southern Rhodesia's civil aviation, 1910s–1953

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.