Policy analysis of the German gas storage levy at cross-border points: Implications for flows, prices, and regional market integration

Milan Hudák et al.

Economics and Sociology2025https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2025/18-2/13article
AJG 1
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

This paper examines the German Gas Storage Levy (Gasspeicherumlage, GSU), enacted in response to the 2022 energy crisis that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. By requiring Trading Hub Europe (THE) to inject substantial gas volumes into storage at soaring prices and then recoup costs via a levy, Germany effectively secured sufficient storage levels to avert a winter supply emergency. However, the application of the levy to cross-border flows provoked legal and political tensions with neighbouring member states, who argued that the measure undermined EU market integration and energy solidarity principles. Through legislative analysis, market data breakdown, and econometric testing, this paper shows how the GSU reshaped cross-border gas flows, created structural price breaks above certain levy thresholds, and ultimately forced a rollback of the charge on exports. The study concludes that while the GSU was successful in securing Germany’s gas supply, its unintended regional consequences highlight the need for a coordinated EU-level approach to crisis responses and cost recovery mechanisms.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2025/18-2/13

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{milan2025,
  title        = {{Policy analysis of the German gas storage levy at cross-border points: Implications for flows, prices, and regional market integration}},
  author       = {Milan Hudák et al.},
  journal      = {Economics and Sociology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2025/18-2/13},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Policy analysis of the German gas storage levy at cross-border points: Implications for flows, prices, and regional market integration

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.