Japan’s Proactive Security Policy After Abe: Strategic Rhetoric and Practical Limitations

Mattia Dello Spedale Venti & Yoichiro Sato

Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs2025https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970251403233article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

The assessment of Japan’s security policy during the first 23 years of the twenty-first century went through a 180-degree turn from that of a reactive pacifist to a proactive strategic player. With the end of the Cold War and the emergence of new challenges at a global and regional level, Japan’s leading political drivers, summed up in the Yoshida Doctrine, seemed unable to address the new geopolitical context, entering a phase of reform. The late Prime Minister Abe Shinzo’s unusually strong and long leadership between 2012 and 2020 undoubtedly contributed to this shift. While the role of prime ministers in post-Abe years appears to have reverted to a more traditional facilitator role, the strategic direction Abe set in such initiatives as the Quadrilateral meetings among the United States, Japan, Australia and India, as well as the enhancement of Japan’s participation in collective defence and security, remain largely intact in rhetoric. Exploring how this rhetoric exercise translated into more tangible security policies, the article examines Japan’s security diplomacy and defence strategy in the post-Abe context.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970251403233

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mattia2025,
  title        = {{Japan’s Proactive Security Policy After Abe: Strategic Rhetoric and Practical Limitations}},
  author       = {Mattia Dello Spedale Venti & Yoichiro Sato},
  journal      = {Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23477970251403233},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Japan’s Proactive Security Policy After Abe: Strategic Rhetoric and Practical Limitations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.