Repair Work in Electronic Medication Management

Morten Hertzum et al.

Computer Supported Cooperative Work2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09526-0article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

High-quality hospital care requires careful medication management. The infrastructure in place to avert errors in medication management involves formal work procedures, elaborate electronic systems, and, we argue, continual repair work. Repair is the work required to restore things to working order after a breakdown. In this study, we analyze the repair work performed by the healthcare professionals tasked with two electronically supported medication-management processes at hospitals in Norway: medication reconciliation and closed-loop medication management. On the basis of interviews and supplementary material, we find that the repair work involved in these two activities is collaborative, continuous, and critical. It is collaborative in that it is performed by physicians, pharmacists, and nurses and, thereby, neither assigned to a single person nor to a group of designated repairers. It is continuous because the repairs do not fix the causes of the breakdowns but merely restore the individual instance of medication management to working order. It is critical in the double sense that repair work is a requirement for quality medication management and that quality repair work is also a requirement. We discuss the implications of the repair work, including the consequences of variation in the achieved level of repairedness.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09526-0

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{morten2025,
  title        = {{Repair Work in Electronic Medication Management}},
  author       = {Morten Hertzum et al.},
  journal      = {Computer Supported Cooperative Work},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09526-0},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Repair Work in Electronic Medication Management

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.