arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Does Romantic Involvement Benefit Everyone? Testing a Foundational Tenet in Relationship Science Through the Case of Asexuality

Giulia Zoppolat et al.

Social Psychological and Personality Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261437286article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

It is established that romantic relationships can benefit well-being and buffer against loneliness. But is that true for everyone? We put this foundational tenet of relationship science to the test by examining whether asexual people (i.e., people who generally do not experience sexual attraction and desire) benefit from romantic involvement. Results from the BBC Loneliness Experiment showed that, unlike heterosexual ( N = 36,464) and other sexual minority people ( N = 3,684), asexual people ( N = 1,443) did not benefit—or did not benefit as strongly (depending on model choice)—from being in a romantic relationship, experiencing similar levels of loneliness regardless of relationship status or relationship satisfaction. However, being in a satisfying relationship did protect asexual people against expectations of loneliness in old age. These results highlight the importance of including populations that are typically excluded from research to test the robustness of established theories and findings in relationship science.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261437286

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{giulia2026,
  title        = {{Does Romantic Involvement Benefit Everyone? Testing a Foundational Tenet in Relationship Science Through the Case of Asexuality}},
  author       = {Giulia Zoppolat et al.},
  journal      = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261437286},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Does Romantic Involvement Benefit Everyone? Testing a Foundational Tenet in Relationship Science Through the Case of Asexuality

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.