(Un)doing Markets: Inter-Field Dynamics, Collective Action and the Emergence of Music Streaming

Carl Yngfalk et al.

Journal of Macromarketing2026https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261429807article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines field-level processes that condition actors’ efforts to mobilize collective strategic action for institutional change in markets, showing how such efforts may unsettle existing arrangements while simultaneously laying the groundwork for new ones. Drawing on strategic action field theory, we analyze the transformation of the recorded music market from physical records to online streaming in the early 2000s. Conceptualizing markets as configurations of interconnected fields, we develop a process model of inter-field dynamics demonstrating how exogenous shocks in proximate fields reconfigure power relations and enable coordinated action. Our analysis traces how collective mobilization destabilized incumbent structures, how struggles over legitimacy facilitated organizational appropriation of emerging practices, and how temporary settlements consolidated a new market infrastructure. We contribute to macromarketing theory by specifying the mechanisms through which market-shaping unfolds across interconnected fields and by explaining why disruption often culminates in settlements that re-stabilize, rather than displace, incumbent power.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261429807

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{carl2026,
  title        = {{(Un)doing Markets: Inter-Field Dynamics, Collective Action and the Emergence of Music Streaming}},
  author       = {Carl Yngfalk et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Macromarketing},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467261429807},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

(Un)doing Markets: Inter-Field Dynamics, Collective Action and the Emergence of Music Streaming

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.