Pricing and Selection of Second-Degree Price Discrimination Menus

José A. Carrasco

The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2025-0060article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We study a second-degree price discrimination problem in which a monopolist must design a menu of pricing options for high and low valuation consumers, whom he cannot directly distinguish. The firm chooses between two canonical nonlinear pricing strategies: a price-quantity menu and a two-part tariff menu . We argue that, when designing each menu, the monopolist optimally balances gains from production against information rent costs. Crucially, information rents translate into fully variable costs under a price-quantity menu, but they introduce fixed costs under a two-part tariff menu. As a result, the menu choice effectively reduces to selecting a revenue structure choice involving a trade off between fixed and variable costs. We find that the monopolist strictly prefers the price-quantity menu, which avoids fixed costs. However, the efficient menu is the one that induces greater consumption by the low-valuation type, and thus might be in conflict with the monopolist’s preferred option. We fully characterize the conditions under which each menu is efficient and identify which pricing strategy benefits the firm, consumers, or both.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2025-0060

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{josé2025,
  title        = {{Pricing and Selection of Second-Degree Price Discrimination Menus}},
  author       = {José A. Carrasco},
  journal      = {The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2025-0060},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pricing and Selection of Second-Degree Price Discrimination Menus

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.