arbiter
JournalsAccount

Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors as Tools for Improving Market Efficiency: A Study on Equity Misvaluation

Xinyu Wang et al.

Business Strategy and the Environment2026https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70486article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This study investigated whether superior environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices enhance corporate value and market efficiency under various economic theories. Using a multi‐country panel of 31 economies from 2015 to 2022, we find that both ESG performance and disclosure improve intrinsic value and mitigate equity misvaluation. The results show that performance exerts a stronger effect than disclosure, encouraging managers to prioritize substantive improvements over greenwashing initiatives. Additionally, ESG practices are negatively associated with overvaluation and positively associated with undervaluation, indicating that higher ESG practices can help improve market efficiency. Moreover, the findings suggest that managers allocate more resources to ESG in advanced economies, where the effects are materially stronger than in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs). Overall, our evidence generalizes beyond single‐country studies and suggests the importance of incorporating ESG information in strategy and decision‐making.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70486

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xinyu2026,
  title        = {{Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors as Tools for Improving Market Efficiency: A Study on Equity Misvaluation}},
  author       = {Xinyu Wang et al.},
  journal      = {Business Strategy and the Environment},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70486},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors as Tools for Improving Market Efficiency: A Study on Equity Misvaluation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.