arbiter
JournalsAccount

Revisiting traffic conflict modelling: comparing generalized Pareto and Lomax models for failure-induced and proximity-based conflicts

Harpreet Singh & Shimul Md Mazharul Haque

Analytic Methods in Accident Research2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2026.100418article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

No abstract available.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2026.100418

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{harpreet2026,
  title        = {{Revisiting traffic conflict modelling: comparing generalized Pareto and Lomax models for failure-induced and proximity-based conflicts}},
  author       = {Harpreet Singh & Shimul Md Mazharul Haque},
  journal      = {Analytic Methods in Accident Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2026.100418},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revisiting traffic conflict modelling: comparing generalized Pareto and Lomax models for failure-induced and proximity-based conflicts

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.