arbiter
JournalsAccount

CEO aging and the MNE internationalization portfolio

Liang Arthur Li et al.

Journal of World Business2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2026.101730article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Considering rapid global aging, we examine how aging CEOs adjust the internationalization portfolios of multinational enterprises (MNEs). We employ cognitive aging theory, which distinguishes between fluid and crystallized intelligence, and analyze panel data from 364 MNEs in Japan, the country with the world’s oldest population. We find two adaptive mechanisms whereby cognitive decline may lead aging MNE CEOs to selectively adjust the internationalization portfolio in a way that reduces the cognitive demands of managing culturally distant host countries. Concurrently, they may be more likely to engage with a portfolio involving host countries with weak institutions, which require experience and intuition—traits that tend to grow with age. These findings challenge the unidimensional conceptualization of CEO aging prevalent in international business research, provide a more nuanced theoretical account of MNE CEO aging, and underscore the managerial aspect of internationalization.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2026.101730

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{liang2026,
  title        = {{CEO aging and the MNE internationalization portfolio}},
  author       = {Liang Arthur Li et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of World Business},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2026.101730},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

CEO aging and the MNE internationalization portfolio

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.