Causal Impact Evaluation of Transport Interventions: An Overview of Methods, Applied Scenarios, and Recent Advances

Yingheng Zhang & Hui Li

Journal of Transport, Economics and Policy2025https://doi.org/10.3828/jtep.2025.59.4.243article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Due to their clear causal interpretability, the potential outcome framework and complementary statistical and econometric methods for causal inference are increasingly applied to ex-post evaluation of a diverse variety of transport interventions. We attempt to present an overview of these methods from a practitioner’s perspective. We start by describing the core concepts and notations of statistical causality in quantitative evaluation tasks, then summarise established analytic techniques. During this process, we introduce their backgrounds and basic ideas, and discuss transport applications. References to more technical issues and recent advances are provided accordingly. Lastly, we outline several challenges and future research directions.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/jtep.2025.59.4.243

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yingheng2025,
  title        = {{Causal Impact Evaluation of Transport Interventions: An Overview of Methods, Applied Scenarios, and Recent Advances}},
  author       = {Yingheng Zhang & Hui Li},
  journal      = {Journal of Transport, Economics and Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3828/jtep.2025.59.4.243},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Causal Impact Evaluation of Transport Interventions: An Overview of Methods, Applied Scenarios, and Recent Advances

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.