Spatial Consumption Inequality in Mozambique

Carlos Gradín

Journal of African Economies2025https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejaf009article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper shows that the trend in spatial inequality almost entirely explains the outstanding surge in inequality in Mozambique over the past decade, as well as its decline immediately after the pandemic, in contrast to its secondary role in the earliest years. For this analysis, I use an innovative regression-based decomposition framework based on the Recentred Influence Function to estimate each area's contribution to inequality and a Blinder–Oaxaca approach to disentangle the nature of their contribution to spatial and non-spatial inequality trends. This rise in inequality was mainly due to a generalised drop in consumption experienced by households in the afflicted rural areas in the north and centre of the country, affected by natural disasters and growing conflict. This was aggravated by disproportionally larger economic growth in two urban areas: the Maputo area, which encompassed the capital, during the expansive phase, and the urban area of coal-rich Tete province during the recession that followed. In more recent years, the crisis disproportionally affected the capital and other urban areas, producing a strong mitigating effect on inequality that might be only temporary. The findings of this research have the potential to significantly inform policy decisions to address inequality in Mozambique.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejaf009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{carlos2025,
  title        = {{Spatial Consumption Inequality in Mozambique}},
  author       = {Carlos Gradín},
  journal      = {Journal of African Economies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejaf009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Spatial Consumption Inequality in Mozambique

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.