Cooking for others is food for the soul: Consistent momentary, but mixed trait‐level well‐being benefits for home cooks

Bryant P. H. Hui et al.

Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being2026https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70121article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Prosocial behavior can promote well-being, yet the effects of everyday acts-such as cooking for others-remain understudied. Across four studies (N > 1,500), we developed and validated a Prosocial Cooking Scale and examined its well-being effects using cross-sectional surveys and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Cross-sectional analyses linked prosocial cooking to greater positive affect-but also higher negative affect-at the between-person level. EMA studies revealed within-person benefits: Individuals reported increased positive affect and subjective happiness-and, in our larger community-based sample, higher self-esteem, vitality, and lower negative affect-during prosocial cooking episodes. However, trait-level associations were modest and inconsistent, emerging most reliably for positive affect. Notably, benefits-including positive affect and self-esteem-were strongest for introverts, supporting a person-activity fit perspective. These findings highlight prosocial cooking as an accessible act conferring well-being gains, and illustrate how EMA captures the impact of kindness in everyday life.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70121

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{bryant2026,
  title        = {{Cooking for others is food for the soul: Consistent momentary, but mixed trait‐level well‐being benefits for home cooks}},
  author       = {Bryant P. H. Hui et al.},
  journal      = {Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70121},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cooking for others is food for the soul: Consistent momentary, but mixed trait‐level well‐being benefits for home cooks

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.