Income inequality, structural change, and inclusive economic growth

Suale Karimu & Attahir Babaji Abubakar

Oxford Development Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2507257article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Sub-Saharan African countries have experienced significant structural change and economic growth in recent decades; however, inequality levels remain high raising concerns that the growth is not inclusive enough to reduce inequality levels. There are extensive debates on the relationship between income inequality and economic growth because this can vary across and along the growth path of countries. This study explores the effect of economic growth and structural change on income inequality using a panel dataset of 40 sub-Saharan African countries over the period 2001-2015. The study employs the iterated Generalized Method of Moment (GMM) estimator for analysis. The findings suggest that although increased income levels in the region fuel inequality, the transition of the economies towards the services sector could reduce income inequality. However, the overall contribution of structural change to reducing inequality levels has been minimal suggesting that the growth experiences of the region, especially over the last two decades, may not have been inclusive, hence the need for enhanced redistributive policies to deepen inclusivity of the growth process.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2507257

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{suale2025,
  title        = {{Income inequality, structural change, and inclusive economic growth}},
  author       = {Suale Karimu & Attahir Babaji Abubakar},
  journal      = {Oxford Development Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2025.2507257},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Income inequality, structural change, and inclusive economic growth

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.