Logistic infrastructure, tax revenue and economic activities: how to finance economic corridors

Muhammad Ayub Mehar

International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation2024https://doi.org/10.1504/ijleg.2024.142078article
ABDC C
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

This study provides a strong justification in favour of economic corridors in CAREC and ECO member countries. A strong and large network of economic corridors is required not only for connectivity but also for improvement in logistic performance. Based on empirical pieces of evidence, it has been noted that growth in tax revenues, enhancement in merchandising trade, and improvement in labor participation rate are the direct effects of improvement in logistic infrastructure. The external debt for the public sector has been classified as a 'Bad mode of financing' in this study because of its negative impact on corporate wealth. It suggests that international infrastructure development companies should provide bridge financing for investment in economic corridors and infrastructure development. These companies can play an intermediatory role in financing long-term macrofinancing projects. The empirical analysis is based on five years of data from 158 countries.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijleg.2024.142078

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{muhammad2024,
  title        = {{Logistic infrastructure, tax revenue and economic activities: how to finance economic corridors}},
  author       = {Muhammad Ayub Mehar},
  journal      = {International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijleg.2024.142078},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Logistic infrastructure, tax revenue and economic activities: how to finance economic corridors

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.