arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

On the use of analytical inequalities for improving reliability and reducing risk

Michael Todinov

International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management2023https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2023.132304article
ABDC C
Weight
0.26

What the paper says

The paper demonstrates a new domain-independent method for improving reliability and reducing risk including two fundamental approaches: the forward approach, based on deriving algebraic inequalities from real systems and processes; and the inverse approach, based on deriving new knowledge by meaningful interpretation of existing correct algebraic inequalities. The forward approach has been used to prove the domain-independent principle of the well-ordered systems which are characterised by the smallest possible risk of failure. The inverse approach has been used to generate new knowledge related to the relationship of the equivalent elastic constants of elements arranged in series and parallel and the upper and lower bounds of the percentage of faulty components in pooled batches of components with unknown sizes.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2023.132304

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{michael2023,
  title        = {{On the use of analytical inequalities for improving reliability and reducing risk}},
  author       = {Michael Todinov},
  journal      = {International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijram.2023.132304},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the use of analytical inequalities for improving reliability and reducing risk

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.