Mindful justice: unveiling the impact of mindfulness on fairness perception and response to perceived workplace injustice

Vaishali Chaprana & Sasmita Palo

Industrial and Commercial Training2025https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-06-2024-0047article
AJG 1
Weight
0.44

What the paper says

Purpose This study examines the relationship between mindfulness and responses to perceived workplace injustice, mediated by fairness judgments. It aims to explain how mindfulness, commonly linked to enhanced well-being and cognitive functioning, affects fairness perceptions and subsequent responses to perceived injustices. Design/methodology/approach Data were gathered from 370 full-time employees across the manufacturing, health care and information technology sectors, all based in India. This cross-sectional data set included individuals undergoing at least one performance appraisal cycle. Advanced statistical software, SPSS 25 and AMOS 22, was used to analyze the data, ensuring a thorough and robust interpretation of the findings. Findings The results indicate that mindfulness predicts fair judgments and responses to injustice, with fairness judgments partially mediating its influence on a positive outlook and avoidance behaviors. However, no mediation effect was observed for articulated dissent. The findings suggest mindfulness supports clear communication during justice processes and promotes a positive outlook. Research limitations/implications The cross-sectional design used in the study restricts the ability to establish causality between mindfulness, fairness judgments and behavioral responses. Longitudinal or experimental designs in future research could provide clearer insights into causal relationships. Findings might be constrained to specific organizational contexts or populations, limiting generalizability. Future studies should aim for broader and larger samples to enhance generalizability. While fairness judgment is suggested as a mediator between mindfulness and avoidance behaviors, the precise mechanisms are unclear. Future research could explore additional mediators or moderators for a more comprehensive understanding. Cultural variations in mindfulness practices and perceptions of fairness may not be fully accounted for in the study. Future research should examine how cultural factors influence the relationships between mindfulness, fairness and behavioral responses. While the study discusses potential implications of mindfulness training, it doesn’t directly test the effectiveness of such interventions. Future research could conduct intervention studies to assess the impact of mindfulness training programs on perceptions of fairness and behavioral outcomes in organizations. The study primarily focuses on immediate reactions to perceived injustice. Future research could investigate the long-term effects of mindfulness on organizational behavior and performance, including its sustainability. Practical implications For managers to comprehend how employees develop and articulate general perceptions of fairness, it is crucial to consider the role of mindfulness as an individual trait. The authors advocate adopting “Mindful Justice” in the workplace, promoting a deliberate cultivation of conscious awareness and a nonjudgmental stance toward fairness and equity issues and using mindfulness techniques like present-moment awareness and compassionate understanding. Social implications The study’s social implications lie in its potential to enhance organizational justice and employee well-being. By highlighting the role of mindfulness in shaping perceptions of fairness and influencing behavioral responses to injustice, the study underscores the importance of promoting mindfulness practices in workplace settings. Implementing mindfulness training programs could cultivate a more equitable work environment by fostering employees’ ability to approach conflicts and perceived injustices with greater awareness and understanding. This, in turn, may lead to reduced conflict, improved employee morale and enhanced organizational citizenship behaviors. Furthermore, by recognizing fairness judgment as a mediator between mindfulness and behavioral responses, organizations can tailor interventions to address fairness perceptions effectively. This insight can inform human resources policies and practices aimed at promoting fairness and mitigating negative reactions to perceived injustices. Overall, the study suggests that integrating mindfulness practices into organizational culture can contribute to creating a more just, harmonious and productive workplace environment, benefiting both employees and the organization as a whole. Originality/value This research uniquely applies mindfulness to Hirschman’s (1970) Voice Theory, demonstrating how mindfulness can enhance the clarity, emotional regulation and empathy required for constructive dissent (voice), deliberate decision-making (exit) and engaged commitment (loyalty) in response to perceived injustice. The introduction of “Mindful Justice” advocates for a mindful approach to addressing fairness and equity in the workplace. This approach emphasizes the deliberate cultivation of awareness and nonjudgmental attitudes toward fairness-related concerns, promoting a culture of equitable and just practices.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-06-2024-0047

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vaishali2025,
  title        = {{Mindful justice: unveiling the impact of mindfulness on fairness perception and response to perceived workplace injustice}},
  author       = {Vaishali Chaprana & Sasmita Palo},
  journal      = {Industrial and Commercial Training},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-06-2024-0047},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mindful justice: unveiling the impact of mindfulness on fairness perception and response to perceived workplace injustice

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.44

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.